Distributed database system with authoritative node

ABSTRACT

An authorizing apparatus for use with a client that connects to a first server in a network is described. The authorizing apparatus includes a second server that authorizes session requests of the client for the first server. A plurality of records of resource allocation data is coupled with the second server. Each record indicates whether a session may be established between the client and the first server. Coupled to the second server is information that associates an entity that includes and is associated with one or more clients, and information that associates the second server to a third server that is authoritative for the second server and the associated clients. Means are provided for receiving a request to establish a session between the client and the first server and for determining, at the second server, based on one of the records that is associated with the client, whether the session may be established when the client is associated with the entity. Also provided are means for informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the second server determines from the one of the records that the session may be established. Although the first, second and third servers have been described as separate servers the functions performed by two or more of the servers may actually be combined in a single server unit.

COPYRIGHT AUTHORIZATION

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by any one of the patent disclosures, as it appears in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the management of network systems, and more specifically to managing the access of a network system using distributed authorization that is controlled by distributed nodes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many network systems can be remotely accessed. Through remote access, individuals can connect to the network system to access resources and obtain information while being located at a remote site. A popular method of providing remote access to a network is through the use of a dial-in network access server (NAS) that controls access to the network. For example, network access server model AS5300, commercially available from Cisco Systems, Inc., can be used to provide dial-in access to a network system. Individuals can access the network system by dialing into the network access server from a Remote Node to establish a connection. In this document, the term Remote Node refers to any client device, such as a personal computer (PC) or router, that can be used to dial in and establish a connection with a network access server. A client/server relationship exists between the Remote Node and the network access server.

To establish a connection with a particular NAS, a user interacts with the user's client computer to cause its modem to dial into the NAS. As part of the dial-in process, the client provides identification information, typically in the form of username/password information, to the NAS as part of a login dialogue. As a result, the NAS establishes a session for the particular user. In this context, a session is a specific connection that has been established for a particular user between a Remote Node and a server and which provides access to a network system. A session is generally identified by the numeric values of a remote port, remote IP address, local port, and local IP address. Once a session is established, the user can access network resources and information.

Controlling and monitoring the number of users or groups of users who are able to login and establish a session with an NAS can be important. For example, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are in the business of allowing customers to login and establish sessions with an NAS to obtain access to resources that are available on the Internet. Several ISPs and Online Services, such as America Online® and CompuServe®, also provide their customers with access to proprietary information (such as proprietary databases and forums) and other online services that are available through their NAS connections. The ISPs and Online Services charge their customers a connection fee that is typically on an hourly connection or monthly flat fee basis. Thus, because their revenue is dependent on fees paid by their customers, ISPs and Online Services need to monitor and control the users or group of users that login and establish sessions with their NASs.

To reduce loads and better serve customers, ISPs and Online Services typically have a large number of NASs. In addition, because their customers may not be in a particular region, many ISPs and Online Services have distributed their NASs across wide geographic regions. A benefit of such distribution is that many customers may dial in and establish a session by a local call. Customers do not need to make a long distance call, and the ISPs and Online Services do not need to provide an “800” number to reduce their customer's connection costs.

However, a drawback with maintaining multiple NASs is that it can be difficult to control the actual number of sessions that are established by a particular user or group of users. A greater number of sessions may be established for a particular user or group of users than is actually authorized (“over-subscription”). For example, a company “A”, who has employees located in five (5) cities (e.g., San Diego, Los Angeles, San Jose, San Francisco and Sacramento) may require and have paid (“subscribed”) for a total of one hundred (100) sessions for its employees. If an NAS is located in each of the five cities, and each NAS allows a total of 100 sessions to be established by the employees of company “A”, then a total of 500 sessions may actually be established by the employees of company “A”, 400 of which are unauthorized. Thus, with multiple NASs, a large number of unauthorized sessions may be established. These unauthorized sessions can potentially represent a significant amount of lost revenue for the ISP. Also, because only a limited number of connections can be made with any one NAS, allowing a large number of unauthorized sessions to be established can significantly reduce the number of authorized sessions that can be established at particular one time.

One method of controlling the number of unauthorized sessions is by assigning a subset or portion of the authorized sessions to each of the NASs. For example, by dividing, between each of the NASs that are located in the different cities, the 100 sessions that are authorized to the employees of company “A”, a total of 20 sessions can be established with each NAS. Thus, the employees of company “A” will be limited to at most the 100 authorized sessions between the NASs in the five different cities.

However, a drawback with this approach is that an employee who is located in a particular city may be denied a session with a the local NAS even though the total number of authorized sessions has not yet been established (“under-subscription”). For example, assume that 100 sessions have been authorized for the employees of company “A”, and that each NAS in one of five cities is authorized to establish a maximum of 20 sessions. Assume further that a total of 20 sessions have already been established by the employees of company “A” with the NAS located in San Jose, but only 10 sessions have been established with each of the other four NASs in the other cities. A request to establish a session with the NAS in San Jose will be denied even though the authorized session limit of 100 has not yet been reached. Thus, splitting the number of authorized sessions between different NASs can produce the unwanted side effect of denying a valid connection request.

Another approach is to identify a central NAS that is used to control the number of sessions that can be established by a user or group of users at any one time. This approach assures that a connection request will not be denied even when the total number of authorized sessions has not yet been reached. Thus, before a NAS can establish a session, it must first communicate with the central NAS to determine whether the maximum number of authorized sessions has already been reached for the particular user or group of users. If a maximum number of sessions have already been established, then the connection request is denied. Conversely, if central NAS indicates that the maximum number has not yet been reached, then the connection request is granted.

However, a serious drawback is associated with always having to communicate with a central NAS to determine whether a connection request should be granted to a particular user or group of users. This approach requires a significant amount of additional communication overhead to determine whether a connection request should be granted. This overhead can significantly degrade the response time for establishing sessions to a network system.

For example, assume that the central NAS is in San Jose. Whenever a connection request is received by the NAS located in San Diego, the San Diego NAS must first communicate with the San Jose NAS to determine whether an additional session may be established for the particular user or group of users. Upon receiving the message, the San Jose NAS must determine whether the total number of authorized sessions have already been established for the particular user or group of users. The San Jose NAS must then send a message to the San Diego NAS indicating whether the session should be granted. The communication overhead that is required in communicating with a central NAS each time a connection request is received can significantly increase the amount of time that is required to establish a session with a non-central NAS. In addition, in larger systems where dozens or even hundreds of NASs are used to provide access to a network system, the delay caused by using a central NAS can dramatically increase the amount of time that is required to establish a session.

Based on the foregoing, there is a clear need for a mechanism that can be used to control and manage the number of sessions that can be established with a network access server by a particular user or group of users for accessing a network system.

There is also a clear need for a mechanism that can reduce the communication overhead that is typically required in controlling the number of users or group of users that can establish a session with a set of network access servers for accessing a network system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The foregoing needs, and other needs and objects that will become apparent from the following description, are achieved in the present invention, which comprises, in one aspect, a method for authorizing a session between a client and a first server, the method comprising the computer-implemented steps of storing, in the first server, an association of the first server to a second server that authorizes session requests for the first server; storing, in the second server, a plurality of records of resource allocation data, in which each record indicates whether a session may be established between the client and the first server; storing, at the second server, an association of an entity that includes and is associated with one or more clients, and an association of the second server to a third server that is authoritative for the second server and the associated clients; receiving a request to establish a session between the client and the first server; determining, at the second server from one of the records that is associated with the client, whether the session may be established when the client is associated with the entity; and informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the second server determines from the one of the records that the session may be established.

According to another feature, the method further comprises the steps of respectively storing, at the second server and the third server, local session authorization information and authoritative session authorization information; when the second server cannot authorize the session based on the local session authorization information, determining, at the third server and based on the authoritative session authorization information, whether the session may be established; and informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the authoritative session authorization information indicates that the session is authorized.

Yet another feature of this aspect is the step of respectively storing, at the second server and the third server, local session authorization information and authoritative session authorization information. This may involve storing, at the second server, a local session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized.

In still another feature, the step of storing a plurality of records of resource allocation data comprises the steps of storing, at the second server, a local session counter that identifies a current number of sessions of the first server.

In still another feature, an authorizing apparatus for use with a client that connects to a first server in a network is described. A second server authorizes session requests of the client for the first server. A plurality of records of resource allocation data are stored in the second server, in which each record indicates whether a session may be established between the client and the first server. In the second server, information is stored that associates an entity that includes and is associated with one or more clients, and information that associates the second server to a third server that is authoritative for the second server and the associated clients. The apparatus further includes means for receiving a request to establish a session between the client and the first server; means for determining, at the second server from one of the records that is associated with the client, whether the session may be established when the client is associated with the entity; and means for informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the second server determines from the one of the records that the session may be established.

According to another feature of this aspect, the authorizing apparatus further comprises local session authorization information and authoritative session authorization information, respectively stored at the second server and the third server; means for determining, at the third server and based on the authoritative session authorization information, and when the second server cannot authorize the session based on the local session authorization information, whether the session may be established; and means for informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the authoritative session authorization information indicates that the session is authorized.

In yet another feature of this aspect, the authorizing apparatus further comprises a local session threshold value, stored at the second server, which identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized.

In still another feature of this aspect, the authorizing apparatus further comprises a local session counter, stored at the second server, that identifies a current number of sessions of the first server.

The invention also encompasses a computer-readable medium, and a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave, configured to carry out the foregoing steps.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:

FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a computer system architecture in which the present invention may be utilized;

FIG. 1B is a block diagram of another computer system architecture in which the present invention may be utilized;

FIG. 2A is a block diagram illustrating a communication sequence for authorizing a session between a client and a network access server;

FIG. 2B is a block diagram illustrating another communication sequence for authorizing a session between a client and a network access server;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing certain internal details of a distributed session counter that is shown in FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a distributed authorization mechanism that may be used to regulate the number of sessions that are established;

FIG. 5A is a flow diagram that illustrates steps involved in a method for authorizing connection requests;

FIG. 5B is a flow diagram that illustrates further steps in the method of FIG. 5A;

FIG. 5C is a flow diagram that illustrates further steps in the method of FIG. 5A;

FIG. 5D is a flow diagram that illustrates further steps in the method of FIG. 5A;

FIG. 6 is flow a diagram that illustrates a method for responding to authorization requests sent by a distributed session counter;

FIG. 7 illustrates a multi-level authorization mechanism that may be used to control the number of sessions that are concurrently active for a particular user;

FIG. 8 illustrates a distributed authorization system in which a user is associated with multiple entities; and

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a computer system hardware arrangement that can be used to implement aspects of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A method and apparatus for managing the access of a network system using a distributed authorization model is disclosed. In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.

Operational Context

A distributed authorization mechanism is provided for managing and regulating connections to a network system. In one embodiment, when a network access server receives a message from a client requesting that a connection be established for accessing a network system, the network access server sends an authorization request message to a “local” distributed session counter (“DSC”) requesting authorization to establish a session with the client. Upon receiving the authorization request message, the local DSC determines whether it can authorize the session itself (the “FAST LANE” approach) or whether the local DSC must communicate with an “authoritative” DSC to determine whether the session should be authorized (the “SLOW LANE” approach).

The terms “local” and “authoritative” are merely convenient labels for the elements that serve as distributed session counters. The term “local” means only that a particular DSC is not authoritative for the particular entity of reference and is not intended to imply a required geographic location.

In one embodiment, to determine whether FAST LANE authorization can be performed, the local DSC retrieves a local session count to determine the number of sessions that are currently established for the particular entity. In this context, a particular entity includes both single users and groups of users. For example, a particular entity may be (1) an individual such as “John”; (2) employees of a particular group of a company, such as the marketing or engineering group; or (3) all employees or groups of individuals that make up a particular company or organization.

After determining the number of sessions that are currently established for the particular entity, the local DSC compares the number of sessions that are currently established for the particular entity with a “local” session threshold value that is maintained for the particular entity. In this context, a local threshold value identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be currently established for a particular entity before SLOW LANE authorization is required. By adjusting the local threshold values, the performance of the distributed system can be tuned to provide faster connection response time (FAST LANE) or a more accurate control of the number of sessions that are established for each entity.

Thus, based on the comparison, the local DSC determines whether it can authorize the session itself (FAST LANE) or whether it must communicate with an authoritative DSC to determine whether the session should be allowed (SLOW LANE). If the local DSC determines that it can authorize the session itself, it sends an authorization grant message back to the network access server without requesting authorization from the authoritative DSC. Thereafter, the local DSC sends a message to the authoritative DSC indicating that a session was authorized for the particular entity.

However, if the local DSC determines that it cannot authorize the session itself, the local DSC sends an authorization request message to the authoritative DSC requesting authorization for establishing a session for the particular entity. Upon receiving the authorization request message from the local DSC, the authoritative DSC determines whether a session should be authorized for the particular entity. In one embodiment, upon receiving the authorization request, the authoritative DSC determines the number of sessions that are currently established for the particular client. In certain embodiments, the authoritative DSC retrieves a “global” session count to determine the number of sessions that are currently established for the particular entity. The authoritative DSC then compares the global session count with a “total” session threshold value that is associated with the particular entity. In this context, the total session threshold value represents the total number of sessions that are to be allowed for a particular entity at any one point in time.

Based on the comparison, the authoritative DSC determines whether the session should be allowed for the particular entity. If the authoritative DSC determines that the session should not be authorized, the authoritative DSC returns an Authorization Denied message back to the local DSC. The local DSC then sends an Authorization Denied message to the network access server to indicate that the session should not be established with the client for the particular entity.

Alternatively, if the authoritative DSC determines that the session should be authorized, the authoritative DSC returns an Authorization Granted message back to the local DSC. The local DSC then sends an Authorization Granted message to the network access server to indicate that the session can be established with the client for the particular entity.

FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a system 100 in which the invention can be used. Generally, the system 100 includes one or more clients 102 a-d, one or more network access servers 104, 106, one or more local distributed session counters (DSCs) 108, 110, an authoritative DSC 112, and a network 114.

Each of the clients 102 a-d may be a device, such as a personal computer, workstation, router, switch or other network device. The particular form of a client 102 a-d is not critical. What is important is that the clients 102 a-d are capable of dialing into network access server 104, 106 to establish sessions 120 a-f, respectively. The clients 102 a-d are respectively used by or associated with users 130 a-d. In this example, the users 130 a-d represent different entities that interact with clients 102 a-d. Although FIG. 1A depicts only a single user (entity) interfacing with each of the clients 102 a-d to establish sessions with network access servers 104, 106, in certain embodiments, multiple users (entities) may interface with one client to establish sessions with network access servers 104, 106.

Remote dial-in connections are typically made using one of the Internet's standard dial-in protocols, such as Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) or the Serial Line Internet Protocol (SLIP). In a preferred embodiment, each connection 120 a-d is established as PPP connections. However, PPP is merely an example of a communications protocol that can be used in an embodiment. Other protocols, such as SLIP, which facilitate the exchange of information between a client and server can be used. PPP is described in “Understanding PPP and PPP Authentication,” accessible at http://www-fr.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/knowledge/wan/ppp_auth.htm. PPP is defined in W. Simpson, “The Point-to-Point Protocol,” RFC 1548, December 1993. The multilink variant of PPP is described in K. Sklower et al., “The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP),” RFC 1990, August 1996.

Network 114 contains resources and information that are protected by and accessible through network access servers 104, 106. Network 114 may be the global packet-switched network known as the Internet, a private Intranet for a particular company, or any combination thereof. The network 114 may form part of a LAN or WAN and may use a variety of different communication protocols.

The network access servers 104, 106 are computers, or one or more hardware or software components or processes that cooperate or execute in one or more computer systems. The network access servers 104, 106 are coupled to the network 114 and provide remote access to the network 114 for clients 102 a-d. Model AS5300, commercially available from Cisco Systems, Inc., can be used as network access servers 104, 106.

In certain embodiments, a firewall (not shown), such as the Cisco PIX Firewall, which is commercially available from Cisco Systems, Inc. may be logically interposed between the network access servers 104, 106, and network 114. The firewall may control access and log-in attempts to network 114 based on identification information that is associated with the outside communication, by intercepting all communications moving to and from the network access servers 104, 106 and determining whether to admit or block the communications. The firewall can be used to prevent unauthorized clients from connecting to network 114 and other devices that are logically behind the firewall.

The network access servers 104, 106 communicate respectively with local DSCs 108, 110 to determine whether a session should be allowed for a particular entity. In this configuration, the local DSCs 108 and 110 function in a manner that is similar to a cache. For example, by “caching” a local threshold value at the local DSCs, a determination can be made as whether a session request can be authorized locally (FAST LANE) or whether communication with an authoritative DSC is required (SLOW LANE).

The network access servers may function as both a client and a server in communicating with the other components. In one embodiment, network access servers 104, 106 are respectively coupled to DSC 108 and DSC 110 over network 126 as shown in FIG. 1A. It should be noted that although FIG. 1A depicts only a single network access server connected to a particular DSC, in certain embodiments, multiple network access servers may connect to a particular DSC.

In this example, for explanation purposes and so as to not obscure certain connections between the components of system 100, authoritative DSC 112 has been illustrated as not being connected to a network access server. However, in a preferred embodiment, one or more network access servers are coupled to authoritative DSC 112. In this context, the authoritative DSC 112 may function as both an authoritative DSC and a local DSC in determining whether a session should be allowed for a particular entity.

The DSCs 108, 110 and 112 may be implemented in one or more servers. Thus, although the term DSC has been used in this context, other terms such as Max Session Server may also be used to describe these components. In certain embodiments, the network access servers and the DSCs may both or separately be configured to execute the Cisco Internetworking Operating System (IOS). In a preferred embodiment, the network 114 includes one or more authorization, authentication, and accounting (AAA) servers (not shown) that execute as part of the network operating system to carry out network authentication and authorization. In a preferred embodiment, the AAA servers reside within the same box or hardware unit as the DSCs. In this context, the DSC functions as a “library” when queried by the AAA server to determine whether a session should be authorized for a particular entity. In addition, in a preferred embodiment, the communication between two DSCs and between a network access server and a DSC is performed by the AAA server that is associated with a DSC.

Appendix A sets forth a preferred communication protocol that may be used, in one embodiment, for communicating between different DSCs and between a DSC and a GUI Administration tool.

FIG. 1B shows an alternative embodiment in which network access servers 104, 106 may be respectively coupled to local DSCs 108, 110 over network 114. For example, local DSCs 108, 110, and authoritative DSC 112 may be coupled to a network system such as the Internet and as such, may communicate with network access servers 104, 106 via the Internet. In certain embodiments, messages that are communicated between network access servers and DSCs are encrypted to maintain a secure communication link over network 114. For example, messages communicated between the network access servers 104 and 106 and the local DSCs 108 and 110 may be encrypted to maintain a secure communication link over network 114. In addition, messages that are communicated between the different DSCs may also be encrypted to provide for a higher level of security.

The local DSCs 108, 110 are computers, or one or more hardware or software components or processes that cooperate or execute in one or more computer systems. In one embodiment, session information is distributed across local DSCs 108, 110 to provide for local authorization of connection requests. For example, local DSCs 108, 110 respectively maintain “distributed session information” for network access servers 104, 106. The distributed session information is used to determine whether local DSCs 108, 110 can themselves authorize connection requests from respective network access servers 104, 106 (FAST LANE), or whether local DSCs 108, 110 need to communicate with the authoritative DSC 112 for authorization (SLOW LANE). The distributed session information that is maintained by the local DSCs 108, 110 is described further below.

The authoritative DSC 112 is also a computer, or one or more hardware or software components or processes that cooperate or execute in one or more computer systems. The authoritative DSC 112 maintains “global session information” that is used, when requested by local DSCs 108, 110, to determine whether a session should be authorize for a particular entity. The authoritative DSC 112 is also responsible for broadcasting global session information to some or all of the one or more local DSCs 108, 110 so that they may maintain up-to-date session information.

“FAST LANE” AND “SLOW LANE” COMMUNICATION SEQUENCES

As previously indicated, using the distributed authorization model, the authorization of a connection request for a particular entity can be performed by a FAST LANE or SLOW LANE authorization communication sequence. In the FAST LANE communication sequence, the time that is required to authorize a connection can be significantly reduced, as the authorization of the connection can be performed locally. The terms “FAST LANE” and “SLOW LANE” are merely labels that suggest the differences of the two communication sequences or approaches, and these terms do not imply or require any particular structure or process in and of themselves.

FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B illustrate examples of a SLOW LANE communication sequence 202 and a FAST LANE communication sequence 204 for authorizing a session between a client and a network access server. For purposes of these examples, assume that user 130 a interacts with client 102 a to establish a session between client 102 a and network access server 104.

In the SLOW LANE communication sequence 202, at state 1A, client 102 a dials into network access server 104 to request a session for user 130 a. At state 2A, the network access server 104 sends a connection request message to local DSC 108, requesting authorization to establish the session. Upon receiving the connection request message, local DSC 108 compares its session threshold value that is associated with user 130 a, with a local session count value. The local session count value represents a local count of the number of sessions that are currently established for user 130 a. As a result, local DSC 108 determines whether authorization can be performed locally by DSC 108.

In this example, assume that local DSC 108 determines that the local session count for user 130 a is currently greater than or equal to the session threshold value associated with user 130 a and, therefore, local DSC 108 cannot authorize the session itself, locally. Consequently, at state 3A, local DSC 108 sends an authorization request message to authoritative DSC 112 requesting authorization to establish a session for user 130 a. Upon receiving the authorization request message, authoritative DSC 112 determines whether a session should be authorized for user 130 a. At state 4A, after determining whether the session should be allowed, authoritative DSC 112 sends a message back to local DSC 108 indicating whether or not the session is authorized. At state 5A, based on the response from authoritative DSC 112, local DSC 108 sends a message to network access server 104 indicating whether or not the session for user 130 a should be established. Finally, if the session has been authorized, network access server 104 may then establish a session with client 102 a for user 103 a.

In the FAST LANE communication sequence 204, at state 1B, client 102 a dials into network access server 104 to request that a connection be established for user 130 a. At state 2B, network access server 104 sends a connection request message to local DSC 108 requesting authorization to establish a session for user 130 a. Upon receiving the request, local DSC 108 compares its session threshold value that is associated with user 130 a, with a local session count value. The local session count value represents a local count of the number of sessions that are currently established for user 130 a. Accordingly, local DSC 108 determines whether it can perform authorization locally itself.

In this example, assume that local DSC 108 determines that the local session count for user 130 a is currently less than the session threshold value associated with user 130 a and, therefore, local DSC 108 can authorize the session itself (locally). As a result, at state 3B, local DSC 108 sends a message to the network access server 104 indicating that a session may be established for user 130 a. Network access server 104 may then proceed to establish a session with client 102 a for user 103 a. At state 4B, the local DSC 108 sends a message to the authoritative DSC 112 indicating that a session has been authorized between client 102 a and network access server 104 for user 130 a. Upon receiving the notification, authoritative DSC 112 updates its global session information to reflect the authorization of the session. At state 5B, authoritative DSC 112 sends a message back to DSC 108 indicating the global session information was updated to reflect the newly established session.

As illustrated, the FAST LANE communication sequence 204 provides a faster authorization response time as authorization can be performed without having to first communicate with the authoritative DSC 112. In certain systems, in which a large number of connection requests may be made concurrently, eliminating the need of having to first communicate with the authoritative DSC 112 for authorization can significant reduce the systems authorization response time.

Distributed Session Counter Configuration

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed session counter 302 showing certain internal details. In certain embodiments, a particular DSC may function as a local DSC, an authoritative DSC or both, as described further below. Each DSC may also function as both a client and a server in communicating with other components of system 100. In one embodiment, the DSCs are configured to execute the Cisco Internetworking Operating System (IOS). In addition, as previously described above, distributed session counter 302 may actually reside within or as part of an AAA server.

In this example, DSC 302 includes an interface process 304, a session management process 306, and a connection data storage area 308. The interface process 304 provides a communication interface that allows DSC 302 to communicate with network access servers and other DSC devices. In certain embodiments, the interface process 304 may have a communication process 312 that can respond to requests from other network access servers and DSC devices. Communication process 312 is a software element, in the preferred embodiment. In one embodiment, communication between the DSC 302 and other network access servers and DSCs may be performed using a client/server relationship. In certain embodiments, the interface process 304 may act as both a client and a server to communicate with other network access servers and DSCs.

Coupled to the interface process 304 is a session management process 306, which is responsible for processing messages received by the interface process 304, and for causing messages to be communicated to the other network access servers and DSCs. In one embodiment, session management process 306 manages, regulates and coordinates the authorizing of sessions for requesting entities. To perform this task, the session management process interfaces with the connection data storage area 308 to store and retrieve connection information.

In one embodiment, when acting as a local DSC, the connection data storage area is used to maintain distributed session information. In certain embodiments, the connection data storage area maintains distributed session information for each entity that has requested a session be established with the particular DSC. The distributed session information for each local DSC may include, but is not limited to, the following information for each entity that has requested a session be established: (1) a local session counter that indicates the total number of sessions that are currently established for the particular entity; (2) a local session threshold that represents a limit as to the number of sessions that can be concurrently established for a particular entity without having to obtain authorization by the authoritative DSC; and (3) an authoritative DSC identifier that indicates a particular DSC that has been assigned as the authoritative DSC for a particular entity.

Table 1 and Table 2 respectively depict examples of the distributed session information that may be maintained in the connection storage area of local DSCs 108, 110 of FIG. 1.

TABLE 1 DISTRIBUTED SESSION INFORMATION LOCAL LOCAL AUTHORITATIVE SESSION SESSION DSC ENTITY THRESHOLD COUNTER IDENTIFIER user 130a  5 1 DSC 112 user 130b 10 1 DSC 112 user 130c 35 2 DSC 112

TABLE 2 DISTRIBUTED SESSION INFORMATION LOCAL LOCAL AUTHORITATIVE SESSION SESSION DSC ENTITY THRESHOLD COUNTER IDENTIFIER user 130c 35 2 DSC 112 user 130d 10 2 DSC 112

Examples of other information that may be contained in the distributed session information include: (1) a DSC session counter for each entity that indicates the number of sessions that have been authorized by the particular DSC (either FAST LANE or SLOW LANE); (2) a DSC session counter for each entity that indicates the number of sessions that have been authorized by the particular DSC (either FAST LANE or SLOW LANE) and which are still currently active; (3) a DSC rejection counter for each entity that indicates the number of connection requests that have been denied by the particular DSC; (4) session termination information that indicates the reason that a session that was authorized by the particular DSC terminated; (5) connection identity information that identifies for each DSC the particular NAS and port that was used to establish a particular session; (6) over-subscription counters that identify for each DSC the number of times over-subscription has occurred for a particular entity; (7) high-water mark indicators that identify for each DSC the extent to which over-subscription has occurred for a particular entity; and (8) various other statistical information that can be used by a local DSC or system administrator to monitor and tune the distributed authorization model.

As previously indicated, a particular DSC may perform the functions of an authoritative DSC instead of, or in addition to acting as a local DSC. In one embodiment, when acting as an authoritative DSC, the connection data storage area is used to maintain global session information. In certain embodiments, the connection data storage area maintains global session information for each entity in which the particular DSC is designated as the authoritative DSC. The global session information for each global DSC may include, but is not limited to, the following information: (1) a global session counter variable that indicates the number of sessions that are currently established for a particular entity; (2) a global session threshold variable that represents a limit as to the total number of sessions that can be concurrently established for the particular entity; and (3) a local DSC list that identifies one or more local DSCs through which authorization of a session for the particular entity has previously been requested.

For example, Table 3 illustrates the global distributed session information may be maintained in the connection storage area of authoritative DSC 112 of FIG. 1.

TABLE 3 GLOBAL DISTRIBUTED SESSION INFORMATION GLOBAL GLOBAL LOCAL SESSION SESSION DSC ENTITY THRESHOLD COUNTER LIST user 130a 10 1 DSC 108 user 130b 15 1 DSC 108 user 130c 100  2 DSC108, DSC110 user 130d 25 2 DSC 110

Examples of other information that may be contained in the global session information include: (1) a DSC session counter for each entity that indicates the number of sessions that have been authorized for a particular DSC; (2) a DSC active session counter for each entity that indicates the number of sessions that have been authorized for a particular DSC and which are still currently active; (3) a DSC rejection counter that indicates for each DSC the number of authorization requests that have been denied on a per entity basis; (4) a DSC over-subscription counter that indicates for each DSC the number of times over-subscription has occurred for a particular entity; (5) a DSC over-subscription watermark that indicates the extent of over-subscription that has occurred for each entity at each NAS; (6) a DSC reserved session counter for each entity that indicates the current number of sessions that are reserved (allocated) but are not yet active; and (7) various other statistical information that may be used by an authoritative DSC or system administrator to monitor and tune the distributed authorization model.

Using the global session information, authoritative DSC 112 can determine the one or more local DSCs through which a session for a particular entity was established. Using this information, the authoritative DSC can determine to which local DSCs it must broadcast data, so as to inform the local DSCs of the total number of sessions that are currently established for a particular entity. In a preferred embodiment, whenever a global session counter is updated in any manner (incremented, decrement or reset), the authoritative DSC broadcasts the updated value to the local DSCs that are identified in its local DSC list.

Regulating the Number of Sessions Established by an Entity

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system 400 that illustrates a distributed authorization mechanism that may regulate the number of sessions that are established for a particular entity.

System 400 includes users 402 and 404, clients 403 and 405, network access servers 406 and 408, local DSCs 410 and 414 and an authoritative DSC 414. In this example, users 402 and 404 are both employed by an entity known as “COMPANY A”. Thus, system 400 has the same general configuration as system 100 of FIG. 1A, FIG. 1B.

Respectively associated with DSCs 410, 412 and 414 are connection data storage areas 416, 418 and 420. In one embodiment, connection data storage areas 416, 418 and 420 are respectively contained in DSCs 410, 412 and 414, as shown in FIG. 3. However, in an alternate embodiment, connection data storage areas 416, 418 and 420 may be maintained separately from one or more of DSCs 410, 412 and 414. In one embodiment, DSCs 410, 412 and 414 may respectively access connection data storage areas 416, 418 and 420 over an internal or external network.

Connection data storage areas 416 and 418 include local distributed session information that is respectively used by local DSCs 410 and 412 to determine if a particular connection request can be authorized locally (FAST LANE) or whether they must request authorization from the authoritative DSC 414 (SLOW LANE). In this example, the local distributed session information in connection data storage area 416 includes a local entity 422 entry for “COMPANY A”. For simplicity, this example assumes that a maximum of three (3) local sessions may be established by NAS 406. Therefore, associated with the local entity 422 entry for “COMPANY A” is a local session threshold variable 424 having a value of “3”, a local session counter variable 426 that is initially set to “−1” and an authoritative DSC variable 428 that is initially set to “NULL”.

Similarly, the local distributed session information in connection data storage area 418 includes a local entity 430 entry for “COMPANY A”. Also for simplicity, this example assumes that a maximum of two (2) local sessions may be established by NAS 408. Associated with the local entity 430 entry for “COMPANY A” is a local session threshold variable 432 that equals “2”, a local session counter variable 434 that is initially set to “−1” and an authoritative DSC variable 436 that is initially set to “NULL”. In certain embodiments, the local session threshold parameters 424 and 432 may be set and adjusted to provide improved system response times while still regulating the number of sessions that are allowed for a particular entity. Although this example illustrates local session threshold variables 424 and 432 having different threshold values, in a preferred embodiment, the local session threshold variables that are associated with a particular entity are all set to the same value within each DSC.

Connection data storage area 420 includes global distributed session information that is used by authoritative DSC 414 to determine whether a particular connection request should be authorized and to distribute global session information to the local DSCs 410 and 412. As depicted, connection data storage area 420 includes an authoritative entity 438 entry for the entity “COMPANY A”. Assume that a maximum of 10 sessions are authorized for system 400. Associated with the authoritative entity 438 entry for “COMPANY A” is a global session threshold variable 440 that is currently set to “10”, a global session counter variable 442 that is initially set to “−1” and a local DSC list 444 that is initially set to “NULL”.

In one embodiment, a global storage area (not shown), that is accessible by the DSCs 410, 412 and 414, contains data that maps a particular authoritative DSC to each entity. The global storage area may be used by DSCs to identify an authoritative DSC associated with a particular entity.

In the example of FIG. 4, at state 1, user 404 interacts with client 405 to dial into network access server 408 to request a connection for the entity COMPANY A. At state 2, network access server 408 communicates with local DSC 412 to request authorization to establish a session for COMPANY A. Upon receiving the authorization request, at state 3, local DSC 412 interfaces with connection data storage area 418 to determine the values of local session threshold variable 432, local session counter variable 434, and authoritative DSC parameter 436.

In this example, local DSC 412 determines that, for COMPANY A, local session threshold variable 432 is currently set to “2”, authoritative DSC variable 436 is set to “NULL”, and local session counter is currently set to “−1.” Accordingly, local DSC 412 determines that a counter has not yet been established for COMPANY A in connection with data storage area 418. Therefore, a SLOW LANE authorization communication sequence is required. At state 4, local DSC 412 identifies DSC 414 as being the authoritative DSC for COMPANY A and then sends an authorization request message to the authoritative DSC 414 requesting authorization for establishing a session for COMPANY A.

In one embodiment, local DSC 412 interfaces with a global storage area (not shown), to determine that DSC 414 is assigned as the authoritative DSC for COMPANY A. Local DSC 412 then stores a value that identifies DSC 414 in authoritative DSC variable 436. To illustrate this, FIG. 4 shows that authoritative DSC variable 436 is set equal to “DSC 414”.

At state 5, upon receiving the authorization request message from local DSC 412, authoritative DSC 414 interfaces with connection data storage area 420 to retrieve the values of the global session threshold variable 440 and global session counter variable 442. Using these values, authoritative DSC 414 may respectively determine the total number of sessions that allowed for COMPANY A and the total number of sessions that are currently established for COMPANY A. The authoritative DSC 414 then compares the value of the global session threshold parameter 440 with the value of the global session counter parameter 442 to determine whether a new session should be authorized. In this example, assume that the global session threshold variable 440 equals “10” and the global session counter parameter 442 is currently equal to “NULL”. Thus, at state 6, authoritative DSC 414 determines that the session should be authorized and therefore causes the global session counter parameter 442 to be updated to “1”.

The authoritative DSC 414 then determines whether local DSC 412 is included in local DSC list 444 in connection data storage area 420. In this example, because the local DSC 412 has not previously requested authoritative DSC 414 to authorize a session for COMPANY A, the local DSC list 444 does not currently include a reference to local DSC 412. Thus, at state 7, authoritative DSC 414 causes local DSC 412 to be added to the local DSC list 444 within connection data storage area 420.

At state 8 authoritative DSC 414 returns an Authorization Granted message back to the local DSC 412. In addition, authoritative DSC 414 uses local DSC list 444 to determine which, if any, DSCs need to be informed of the new current number of sessions that have been authorized for COMPANY A. In one embodiment, a broadcast message with the new current number of sessions is sent to the local DSC that sent the authorization request message. For example, either before or after sending the authorization granted message back to the local DSC 412, the authoritative DSC 414 may broadcast the new current number of sessions to local DSC 412.

In another embodiment, the DSCs that receive the new current number of sessions do not include the local DSC that sent the authorization request message. Instead, the new current number of sessions is included in the authorization granted message that is returned to the local DSC that sent the authorization request message. For example, the Authorization Granted message returned to local DSC 412 in state 8 may include the new current number of sessions for COMPANY A.

At state 9, local DSC 412 causes local session counter 434 in connection data storage area 418 to be updated from “NULL” to “1” to reflect a new current number of sessions for COMPANY A. At state 10, local DSC 412 sends a message to network access server 408 indicating that the session can be established with COMPANY A. At state 11, user 404 interfaces with client 405 to dial into network access server 408 to request that a second connection be established for the entity COMPANY A.

At state 12, the network access server 408 communicates with local DSC 412 to request authorization to establish another session for COMPANY A. Upon receiving the authorization request, at state 13, local DSC 412 interfaces with connection data storage area 418 to determine the values of local session threshold variable 432, local session counter variable 434, and authoritative DSC variable 436.

In this example, local DSC 412 determines that local session threshold variable 432 is currently set to “2”, authoritative DSC variable 436 is set to “DSC 414”, and local session counter variable 434 is set to “1”. Local DSC 412 then compares the value of local session threshold variable 432 with the value of local session counter variable 434. In this case, because the value of local session counter variable 434 (“1”) is less than or equal to the value of the local session threshold variable 432 (“2”) a FAST LANE authorization communication sequence can be performed. Therefore, at state 14, local DSC 412 causes local session counter variable 434 to be updated from “1” to “2” to reflect a new current number of sessions for COMPANY A.

At state 15, local DSC 412 sends a message to network access server 408 indicating that the session can be established with COMPANY A. At state 16, local DSC 412 sends an authorization update message to authoritative DSC 414 indicating that a session has been authorized for COMPANY A.

At state 17, upon receiving the authorization update message from local DSC 412, authoritative DSC 414 causes the global session counter variable 442 values in connection data storage area 420 to be updated to reflect the authorization of another session for COMPANY A. In this example, the value of global session counter variable 442 is set to “2”. At state 18, authoritative DSC 414 sends a reply message back to local DSC 412 indicating that the authorization update message was received and that the global session counter variable 442 has been updated to “2”.

At state 19, user 402 interfaces with client 403 to dial into network access server 406 to request that a connection be established for COMPANY A. At state 20, network access server 406 communicates with local DSC 410 to request authorization to establish a session for COMPANY A. Upon receiving the authorization request, at state 21, local DSC 410 interfaces with connection data storage area 416 to determine the values of local session threshold variable 424, local session counter variable 426, and authoritative DSC variable 428. In one embodiment, local DSC 410 interfaces with a global storage area (not shown), that maps a particular authoritative DSC to each entity. In this example, local DSC 410 determines that COMPANY A is mapped to authoritative DSC 414 and therefore updates authoritative DSC variable 428 in connection data storage area 416 to “DSC 414”.

In addition, local DSC 410 determines that for COMPANY A, local session threshold variable 424 is currently set to “3” and that local session counter is currently set to “−1”, thus indicating that a counter has not yet been established for COMPANY A in connection data storage area 416. Because a counter has not yet been established for COMPANY A, a SLOW LANE authorization communication sequence is carried out. Therefore, at state 22, local DSC 410 sends an authorization request message to the authoritative DSC 414 requesting authorization for establishing a session for COMPANY A.

At state 23, upon receiving the request from local DSC 410, authoritative DSC 414 retrieves values of global session threshold variable 440 and global session counter variable 442 from connection data storage area 420. These values enable authoritative DSC 414 to respectively determine the total number of sessions that allowed for COMPANY A and the total number of sessions that are currently established for COMPANY A. Authoritative DSC 414 then compares the value of global session threshold variable 440 with the value of global session counter variable 442 to determine whether the session should be authorized. In this example, the global session threshold variable 440 currently equals “10” and the global session counter variable 442 is currently equal to “2“. Thus, at state 24, authoritative DSC 414 determines that a new session should be authorized and therefore causes the global session counter variable 442 to be set to a value of “3”.

The authoritative DSC 414 then determines whether the local DSC 410 is included in local DSC list 444. In this example, because local DSC 410 has not previously sent a request to authoritative DSC 414 to authorize a session for COMPANY A, local DSC list 444 does not currently include a reference to local DSC 410. Thus, at state 25, authoritative DSC 414 causes a value identifying local DSC 410 to be added to local DSC list 444. At state 26, authoritative DSC 414 broadcasts a message that contains the updated global session counter variable 442 value to the DSCs referenced in DSC list 444. In this example, the DSC 414 broadcasts a message containing a value of “3” to DSC 412 and to DSC 410.

At state 27, upon receiving the broadcast message, local DSC 412 updates local session counter variable 434 to reflect the updated value (“3”) of global session counter 442. At state 28, an Authorization Granted message is sent to local DSC 410, with the updated value of global session counter variable 442 value for COMPANY A. At state 29, local DSC 410 causes local session counter variable 426 to be set to “3” to reflect the new current number of sessions for COMPANY A. At state 30, the local DSC 410 sends a message to network access server 406 indicating that the session can be established for COMPANY A.

Responding to a Connection Request

FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 5C and FIG. 5D are flow diagrams that illustrate a method for authorizing connection requests in the foregoing context. The steps of FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 5C and FIG. 5D will be explained with reference to FIG. 4.

At block 502, a connection request is received. For example, a DSC receives a connection request from a network access server, requesting authorization to establish a session for a particular entity. Assume that user 404 interacts with client 405 to dial into network access server 408 to establish a session for the entity “COMPANY_A”. Assume further that in response, network access server 408 sends a connection request to local DSC 412 to request authorization to establish a session for COMPANY_A.

At block 504, the entity associated with the connection request is determined. In one embodiment, the received connection request includes information that identifies the particular entity, and the determination is done by the DSC. At block 506, the DSC determines whether a connection request has previously been received for the particular entity. For example, upon receiving the connection request, the local DSC 412 searches the distributed session information in connection data storage area 418 to determine whether an entry for COMPANY_A has previously been entered.

If the DSC determines that a connection request has not previously been received for the particular entity then, control proceeds to block 510. However, if the DSC determines that a connection request has previously been received for the particular entity then, at block 508, the DSC determines whether FAST LANE authorization may be performed to determine whether a session should be authorized. For example, local DSC 412 compares the value of the local session threshold counter 432 with the value of the local session counter 434 to determine whether a FAST LANE authorization can be performed. If at block 508 the DSC determines that a FAST LANE authorization can not be performed then, control proceeds to block 510.

Alternatively, if the DSC determines that a FAST LANE authorization can be performed then, at block 513 a FAST LANE authorization is performed to authorize the session. At block 514, the DSC updates its distributed session information to reflect that an additional session will be established for the particular entity. For example, local DSC 412 increments local session counter 434 in the distributed session information in connection data storage area 418 to indicate an additional session has been authorized for COMPANY_A.

At block 515, the DSC returns an authorization granted message to the requesting network access server to indicate a session may be established with the particular entity. The network access server may then perform the necessary functions to establish the session for the particular entity. For example, local DSC 412 returns an authorization granted message to the network access server 408, to indicate a session could be established with COMPANY_A. The network access server 408 then performs the necessary functions to establish a session with the client 405 for COMPANY_A.

At block 516, the DSC identifies the authoritative DSC that is assigned to the particular entity. In one embodiment, a global database that is accessible by the different DSCs contains a mapping that identifies the authoritative DSC that is assigned to a particular entity. Thus, by communicating with the global database, the DSC can identify the authoritative DSC that is assigned to the particular entity.

At block 517, the DSC determines whether it is the authoritative DSC assigned to the particular entity. If the DSC determines that it is not the assigned authoritative DSC for the particular entity then, at block 520, the DSC sends an update message to the assigned authoritative DSC to indicate that the DSC has authorized a session to be established for the particular entity. For example, if local DSC 412 determines that authoritative DSC 414 is the authoritative DSC assigned to COMPANY_A, local DSC 412 sends an update message to authoritative DSC 414 to indicate that a session has been authorized for COMPANY_A.

The DSC may determine, at block 517, that it is the assigned authoritative DSC for the particular entity. In that case, at block 518, the DSC updates the global session information in its connection data storage area to reflect that an additional session will be established. The DSC functions, in effect, as the assigned authoritative DSC for the entity.

At block 519, the DSC identifies the other DSCs that have previously sent an authorization request for the particular entity and broadcasts the update to the identified DSCs. Upon receiving the update, the identified DSCs update their own distributed session information to reflect the received updates. For example, assuming local DSC 412 is the assigned authoritative DSC for COMPANY_A, local DSC 412 uses the local DSC list in the global session information in its connection data storage area 418 to identify the DSCs for broadcasting. The local DSC 412 then broadcasts an update message that contains the updated information to each of the identified DSCs.

At step 510, the DSC identifies the authoritative DSC that is assigned to the particular entity. In one embodiment, a global database that is accessible by the different DSCs contains a mapping that identifies the authoritative DSC that is assigned to a particular entity. Thus, by communicating with the global database, the DSC can identify the authoritative DSC that is assigned to the particular entity. In addition to identifying the authoritative DSC that is assigned to a particular entity, the global database may also include user profile information. For example, the global database may include user profile information that associates a single entity, such as “John”, with a group entity, such as “COMPANY_A”. In certain embodiments, each DSC maintains its own local copy of some or all of the information that is maintained in the global database. In this context, known database replication technology is used to replicate the information to each local copy.

At block 512, the DSC determines whether it is the authoritative DSC assigned to the particular entity. If at block 512 the DSC determines that it is the assigned authoritative DSC for the particular entity then, control proceeds to block 536. However, if at block 512 the DSC determines that it is not the assigned authoritative DSC for the particular entity then, at block 521, a SLOW LANE authorization is performed.

At block 522, the DSC sends an authorization request message to the assigned authoritative DSC requesting authorization for establishing a session for the particular entity. For example, local DSC 412 sends an authorization message to authoritative DSC 414 requesting authorization for establishing a session for COMPANY_A. At step 524, the DSC waits for the assigned authoritative DSC to respond to its authorization message. Many factors may effect the amount of time that it takes for a response to be received back from the assigned authoritative DSC. In one embodiment, the DSC uses a timer that signals the DSC after a particular amount of time has elapsed. In certain embodiments, the DSC uses the timer to indicate the message may have been lost and that the authorization request message should be resent to the assigned authoritative DSC.

At block 526, a response from the assigned authoritative DSC is received at the DSC. At block 528, based on the response from the assigned authoritative DSC, the DSC determines whether a session should be established. If at block 528 the DSC determine that a session should not be established, at block 530, the DSC returns an Authorization Denied message to the requesting network access server to indicate that a session should not be established for the particular entity. For example, upon receiving a response from authoritative DSC 414 that indicates a session should not be established for the entity COMPANY_A, local DSC 412 returns an Authorization Denied message to network access server 408.

However, if at block 528 the DSC determines that a session should be established, then at block 532, the DSC updates its distributed session information to reflect that an additional session will be established. For example, local DSC 412 increments local session counter 434 to indicate an additional session is authorized for COMPANY_A.

At block 534, the DSC returns an Authorization Granted message to the requesting network access server to indicate a session may be established with the particular entity. The network access server may then perform the necessary functions to establish the session for the particular entity. At block 536, the DSC, functioning as the assigned authoritative DSC for the particular entity, determines whether a session should be established for the particular entity. In one embodiment, to determine whether a session should be established for the particular entity, the DSC compares the value of the global session threshold with the value of the global session counter, for the particular entity. If the value of the global session threshold is less than or equal to the value of the global session counter, the DSC determines that a session should not be established for the particular entity. However, if the value of the global session threshold is greater than the value of the global session counter, the DSC determines that a session should be established for the particular entity.

If at block 536 the DSC determines that a session should not be established for the particular entity, then at block 538 the DSC returns an Authorization Denied message to the requesting network access server to indicate that a session should not be established for the particular entity. However, at block 536 the DSC may determine that a session should be established. In that case, at block 540, the DSC updates the global session information to reflect that an additional session will be established for the particular entity. In this respect, the DSC functions as the assigned authoritative DSC for the entity.

At block 542, the DSC updates its distributed session information to reflect that an additional session will be established. For example, local DSC 412 increments local session counter 434 in the distributed session information in connection data storage area 418. At block 544, the DSC returns an Authorization Granted message to the requesting network access server, indicating that a session may be established with the entity. The network access server may then perform functions necessary to establish the session. For example, local DSC 412 returns an Authorization Granted message to network access server 408 to indicate a session may be established with COMPANY_A. Network access server 408 then establishes a session with client 405 for COMPANY_A.

At block 546, the DSC identifies the other DSCs that have previously sent an authorization request for the entity, and broadcasts the update to those DSCs. Upon receiving the update, the DSCs update their own distributed session information to reflect the received updates. For example, assuming local DSC 412 is the assigned authoritative DSC for the entity COMPANY_A, local DSC 412 uses the local DSC list in the global session information in its connection data storage area 418 to identify the DSCs for broadcasting. Local DSC 412 then broadcasts an update message that contains the updated information to each of the identified DSCs.

Responding to an Authorization Request

FIG. 6 is flow a diagram that illustrates a method for responding to authorization requests sent by a DSC in the foregoing context. The steps of FIG. 6 are explained with reference to FIG. 4.

At block 602, an authorization request is received from a DSC. For example, an authorization request is received at an authoritative DSC from a local DSC requesting authorization to establish a session for a particular entity. Assume that an authorization request is received at authoritative DSC 414 from local DSC 412 requesting authorization to establish a session for the entity “COMPANY_A”. Assume also that authoritative DSC 414 has been assigned as the authoritative DSC for COMPANY_A.

At block 604, the authoritative DSC for the entity determines whether a session should be established. In one embodiment, the authoritative DSC compares the value of the global session threshold with the value of the global session counter, for the particular entity. For example, upon receiving an authorization request from local DSC 412 for COMPANY_A, authoritative DSC 414 compares the value of global session threshold 440 with global session counter 420, for the entity, maintained in the global session information in connection data storage area 420. If the value of the global session threshold 440 is less than or equal to the value of the global session counter 442, then a session should not be established for COMPANY_A. However, if the authoritative DSC 414 determines that the value of global session threshold 440 is greater than global session counter 442, then a session should be established for COMPANY_A.

If at block 604 the authoritative DSC determines that a session should not be established, then at block 606, the authoritative DSC returns an Authorization Denied message to the requesting local DSC to indicate that a session should not be established. For example, in response to determining that a session should not be established for COMPANY_A, authoritative DSC 414 returns an Authorization Denied message to local DSC 412 indicating that a session should not be established for the entity COMPANY_A. Control then proceeds to block 614.

However, if the authoritative DSC determines that a session should be established for the particular entity, then at block 608 the authoritative DSC updates the global session information in its connection data storage area to show that an additional session will be established for the particular entity. For example, in response to determining that a session may be established for COMPANY_A, authoritative DSC 414 updates global session counter 442 to reflect that a session will be established for COMPANY_A.

At block 610, the authoritative DSC returns an Authorization Granted message to the requesting local DSC to indicate that a session can be established with the particular entity. For example, authoritative DSC 414 returns an Authorization Granted message to local DSC 412 indicating that a session can be established for COMPANY_A.

At block 612, the authoritative DSC identifies the other DSCs that have previously sent an authorization request for COMPANY_A and broadcasts the update to those DSCs. Upon receiving the update, the identified DSCs update their own distributed session information to reflect the received update. In one embodiment, the authoritative DSC uses a local DSC list that is maintained in the global session information in its connection data storage area to identify the DSCs for broadcasting. For example, assuming that local DSC 410 had previously sent an authorization request to authoritative DSC 414 for the entity COMPANY_A, in searching local DSC list 444, authoritative DSC 414 identifies local DSC 410 for broadcasting. The authoritative DSC 414 then broadcasts to local DSC 410 the updates that are maintained in the global session information in connection data storage area 420 for entity COMPANY_A. Upon receiving the update, the local DSC 410 causes its own distributed session information to reflect the received updates

At block 614, if the authorization request message represents the first authorization request that was sent by the local DSC for the particular entity, then the authoritative DSC updates the global session information in its connection data storage area. The updates indicate that changes to the global session information for the particular entity should be broadcast to the local DSC. For example, if the authorization request message is the first authorization request sent by local DSC 412 for COMPANY_A, then authoritative DSC 414 updates local DSC list 444 to include an entry for DSC 412.

Terminating Sessions

In one embodiment, when a session terminates, a network access server sends a connection termination message to a DSC to indicate that a session for a particular entity terminated. In one embodiment, the network access server maintains a record that indicates, for each session, the particular DSC that authorized the session for the entity. In certain embodiments, the network access server uses the record to send the connection termination message to the same DSC that authorized the terminated session. In another embodiment, the network access server selects a DSC other than the one that authorized the terminated session for sending the connection termination message.

Upon receiving a connection termination message, the DSC identifies the authoritative DSC assigned to the particular entity. If the DSC determines that itself is the authoritative DSC assigned to the entity, it updates the global session information in its connection data storage area to reflect termination of the session. The DSC then identifies the other DSCs that previously sent an authorization request for the particular entity and broadcasts the update to the identified DSCs. Upon receiving the broadcast update, the identified DSCs update their own distributed session information to reflect that the session terminated.

However, if the DSC determines that it is not the authoritative DSC assigned to the entity, the DSC sends a session termination message to the authoritative DSC that is assigned to the entity. In response, the authoritative DSC updates the global session information in its connection data storage area to reflect the termination of the session for the particular entity. The authoritative DSC then identifies the other DSCs that previously sent an authorization request for the particular entity and broadcasts the update to those DSCs. Upon receiving the broadcast update, those DSCs update their own distributed session information.

Multiple User Entities

In certain embodiments, a particular user may be associated with more than one entity. For example, a user by the name of “John” who works in the “Engineering Department” of “COMPANY A” may be associated with three entities (a client computer named John, the Engineering Department, and COMPANY A). Each entity is assigned a separate global session threshold value that defines the maximum number of sessions that may be established for an entity at a time. For example, client computer John may be assigned a global session threshold value of “5”; the Engineering Department may be assigned a global session threshold value of “100”; and COMPANY A may be assigned a global session threshold value of “1000”.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a multi-level authorization mechanism 700 that may be used to control the number of sessions that are concurrently active for a particular user. In this example, COMPANY_A is assigned a global session threshold value of “100”. Marketing Department and Engineering Department of COMPANY_A are respectively assigned global session threshold values of “12” and “15”. Steve and the Kim, which are client computers associated with employees in the Marketing Department of COMPANY_A, are respectively assigned global session threshold values of “5” and “10”. John and Lisa, which represent client computers associated with employees in the Engineering Department, have global session threshold values of “10” and “7”.

In one embodiment, the global session threshold values that are assigned to entities, and that are associated with a particular user, are used as a multi-level authorization mechanism to determine whether a session should authorized for the particular user. For example, the user 706 is associated with the entities John, Engineering Department and COMPANY_A. Therefore, to determine whether a session should be authorized for user 706, the number of sessions that are currently active for the entities John, Marketing Department and COMPANY_A must be determined and compared against their respective global session threshold values. If the number of currently active sessions for any of the entities John, Marketing Department or COMPANY_A is greater than or equal to their respective global session threshold values, then authorization is denied.

For example, if COMPANY_A currently has 50 active sessions, the entity Engineering Department currently has 10 sessions and the entity John has 5 sessions, then a request to establish a session for user 706 will be authorized. Authorization will be granted because the number of sessions that are currently active for each entity is less than each respective global session threshold value. However, if COMPANY_A currently has 50 active sessions, Engineering Department has 15 active sessions and John has 0 sessions, then a request to establish a session for user 706 will not be authorized. Authorization is denied because at least one entity, the Engineering Department, currently has its maximum number of sessions.

Distributing Multiple User Entities

In one embodiment, multiple entities that are associated with a particular user are each assigned an authoritative DSC. In certain embodiments, the entities associated with a particular user may be assigned the same authoritative DSC or assigned to different authoritative DSCs. For each entity, the authoritative DSC that is assigned maintains global session information for the particular entity.

FIG. 8 illustrates a distributed authorization system 800 in which a user 802 is associated with three entities (John, Engineering Department, and COMPANY_A). In this example, DSC 808 is assigned as the authoritative DSC for John; DSC 810 is assigned as the authoritative DSC for Engineering Department; and DSC 812 is assigned as the authoritative DSC for COMPANY_A. DSC 808 maintains global session information 826 in connection data storage area 814 for John; DSC 810 maintains global session information 828 in connection data storage area 816 for Engineering Department; and DSC 812 maintains global session information 830 in connection data storage area 818 for COMPANY_A.

For purposes of this example, assume:

1. Global session information 826 stores the values: Global session threshold =“10”; global session counter =“1”; local DSC list=”DSC 808”.

2. Distributed session information 820 stores the values shown in Table 4:

TABLE 4 DISTRIBUTED SESSION INFORMATION 820 VALUES LOCAL LOCAL SESSION SESSION AUTHORITATIVE ENTITY THRESHOLD COUNTER DSC JOHN 2 1 DSC 808 ENGINEERING 5 1 DSC 810 DEPT COMPANY_A 20  15  DSC 812

3. Global session information 828 stores the values: Entity=“Engineering Department”; global session threshold=15; global session counter=8; local DSC list=“DSC 808”.

4. Global session information 830 stores the values: Entity=“COMPANY_A”; global session threshold=“100”; global session country=15; local DSC list=“DSC 808”.

User 802 interacts with client 804 to dial into network access server 806 to request the NAS to establish a session. In response, NAS 806 sends a connection request to DSC 808 requesting authorization to establish a session. In a preferred embodiment, a local database, as previously described, is associated with the DSC 808 and contains information that identifies the request as being associated with John, Engineering Department and COMPANY_A. In certain embodiments, the network access server 806 may include information that identifies the request as associated with John, Engineering Department and COMPANY_A. Upon receiving the request, the DSC 808 determines whether a FAST LANE authorization may be performed on a per entity basis.

For example, in receiving the request, the DSC 808 determines whether a FAST LANE authorization may be performed for John. As described in connection with FIG. 4, DSC 808 stores distributed session information 820 for determining whether a FAST LANE authorization sequence can be performed. In this example, for John, the local session counter value is “1” and the local session threshold value is “2”, so that DSC 808 determines that a FAST LANE authorization sequence can be performed. In addition, because DSC 808 is assigned as the authoritative DSC for John, DSC 808 may itself determine whether a session should be authorized for John even if a FAST LANE authorization sequence could not be performed.

Alternatively, for Engineering Department, because the local session counter value equals “5” and the local session threshold value equals “8”, the DSC 808 determines that a SLOW LANE authorization sequence must be performed. In this case, the DSC 808 identifies DSC 810 as the authoritative DSC for Engineering Department and initiates a SLOW LANE authorization sequence by sending a connection request for Engineering Department to DSC 810.

However, for COMPANY_A, the local session counter value is “15” and the local session threshold value equals “20”. Therefore, DSC 808 determines that a FAST LANE authorization sequence can be performed. DSC 808 identifies DSC 810 as the authoritative DSC for Engineering Department and initiates a SLOW LANE authorization sequence by sending a connection request for Engineering Department to DSC 810.

Based on whether a session can be authorized for each of the entities, DSC 808 determines whether an Authorization Granted or an Authorization Denied message should be sent to network access server 806. In one embodiment, if DSC 808 determines that a session can be authorized for each entity, DSC 808 returns an Authorization Granted message to network access server 806 to indicate that a session for user 802 may be established. Alternatively, if DSC 808 determines that a session cannot be authorized for one or more of the entities, the DSC 808 returns an Authorization Denied message to network access server 806 to indicate that a session should not be established. In one embodiment, DSC 808 returns an Authorization Denied message to network access server 806 immediately after determining that a session cannot be authorized for one of the entities. Thus, DSC 808 is not required to wait for every authoritative DSC to respond to before returning an authorization denied message to network access server 806 once it is determined that a session cannot be authorized for an entity.

In certain embodiments, if a DSC determines that a session cannot be granted, the DSC must inform any authoritative DSC that authorized the session for a particular entity that was associated with the request. Once notified, the authoritative DSCs may then update the global session counter that is associated with the entity to reflect that a session could not be established. For example, In a preferred embodiment, a local database, as previously described, is associated with the DSC 808 and contains information that identifies the request as being associated with John, Engineering Department and COMPANY_A. In certain embodiments, the network access server 806 may include information that identifies the request as associated with John, Engineering Department and COMPANY_A. Upon receiving the request, the DSC 808 determines whether a FAST LANE authorization may be performed on a per entity basis.

For example, assume that DSC 808 receives a request from network access server 806 to authorize a session for John. Also assume that “15” sessions are currently active for the Engineering Department, thus another session should not be authorized for the Engineering Department. Because John is in the Engineering Department of COMPANY_A, DSC 808 must send an authorization request to both DSC 810 and DSC 812 to respectively request authorization to establish a session for the Engineering Department and the COMPANY_A. In receiving the authorization request from DSC 808, DSC 812 determines that a session can be established for COMPANY_A. DSC then updates its global session counter to indicate that another session has been authorized for COMPANY_A and returns an Authorization Granted message to DSC 808. Alternatively, in receiving the authorization request from DSC 808, DSC 810 determines that a session cannot be established for the Engineering Department and therefore returns an Authorization Denied message to DSC 808. Thus, because the session cannot be established, DSC 808 must notify DSC 812 that the session was not established for COMPANY_A and that global session counter for COMPANY_A should be updated to reflect that the session was not established.

It should be noted that for explanation purposes FIG. 8 depicts connection storage area 814 having connection information for John in both distributed session information 820 and global session information 826. However, because DSC is assigned as the authoritative server for John, connection information for John need only be maintained in global session information 826. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the connection information that is stored in the DSC that is assigned as the authoritative server for a particular entity is maintained in only the global session information of the DSC.

Hardware Overview

FIG. 9 is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system 900 upon which an embodiment of the invention may be implemented. Computer system 900 includes a bus 902 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor 904 coupled with bus 902 for processing information. Computer system 900 also includes a main memory 906, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 902 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 904. Main memory 906 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 904. Computer system 900 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 908 or other static storage device coupled to bus 902 for storing static information and instructions for processor 904. A storage device 910, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, is provided and coupled to bus 902 for storing information and instructions.

Computer system 900 may be coupled via bus 902 to a display 912, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 914, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 902 for communicating information and command selections to processor 904. Another type of user input device is cursor control 916, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 904 and for controlling cursor movement on display 912. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane.

The invention is related to the use of computer system 900 for managing the access of a network system using a distributed authorization model. According to one embodiment of the invention, a distributed authorization model is provided by computer system 900 in response to processor 904 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 906. Such instructions may be read into main memory 906 from another computer-readable medium, such as storage device 910. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 906 causes processor 904 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention. Thus, embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.

The term “computer-readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 904 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 910. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 906. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 902. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.

Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave as described hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer can read.

Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 904 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 900 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 902. Bus 902 carries the data to main memory 906, from which processor 904 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 906 may optionally be stored on storage device 910 either before or after execution by processor 904.

Computer system 900 also includes a communication interface 918 coupled to bus 902. Communication interface 918 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 920 that is connected to a local network 922. For example, communication interface 918 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communication interface 918 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 918 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.

Network link 920 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 920 may provide a connection through local network 922 to a host computer 924 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 926. ISP 926 in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 928. Local network 922 and Internet 928 both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 920 and through communication interface 918, which carry the digital data to and from computer system 900, are exemplary forms of carrier waves transporting the information.

Computer system 900 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 920 and communication interface 918. In the Internet example, a server 930 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 928, ISP 926, local network 922 and communication interface 918. In accordance with the invention, one such downloaded application provides for managing the access of a network system using a distributed authorization model as described herein.

The received code may be executed by processor 904 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 910, or other non-volatile storage for later execution. In this manner, computer system 900 may obtain application code in the form of a carrier wave.

Alternatives, Extensions

The FAST LANE/SLOW LANE mechanism that is described herein allows operators to set a threshold above which using cached data in the form of values stored in the local distributed session counters can no longer be considered safe. Thus, the FAST LANE/SLOW LANE technique provides an intuitive control mechanism that allows operators to tune their systems to balance the tradeoffs between speed and accuracy. This technique has applications in many forms of resource allocation, management, and provisioning. It may also have applications in systems that include one or more values that have a definable maximum rate of change.

In describing certain embodiments of the invention, several drawing figures have been used for explanation purposes. However, the invention is not limited to any particular context as shown in drawing figures, and the spirit and scope of the invention include other contexts and applications in which the distributed authorization model described herein is available to other mechanisms, methods, programs, and processes. For example, the network access servers and the DSCs have been illustrated as separate components. However, in certain embodiments of the invention a network access server and a DSC may function as a single unit. For example, referring to FIG. 1A, the functions described for the network access server 104 and the local DSC 108 may be combined into a single unit. Likewise, the functions of authoritative DSC 112 may be combined with the functions of a network access server in a single unit. Thus, the specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

As another example, there is need to maintain both the local session information and the global session information within the same connection storage area. For example, global session information 826 shown in FIG. 8 may be maintained in a connection data storage area that is completely separate from the connection data storage area in which distributed session information 820 is maintained.

In addition, in this disclosure, including in the claims, certain process steps are set forth in a particular order, and alphabetic and alphanumeric labels are used to identify certain steps. Unless specifically stated in the disclosure, embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular order of carrying out such steps. In particular, the labels are used merely for convenient identification of steps, and are not intended to imply, specify or require a particular order of carrying out such steps. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of authorizing a session between a client and a first server, the method comprising the computer-implemented steps of: (A) storing, in the first server, data that identifies a second server as a distributed authorization server for authorizing session requests for the first server; (B) storing, in the second server, distributed resource allocation data that indicates whether said second server may locally authorize a session to be established for a particular entity between the client and the first server; (C) storing, at the second server, data that identifies a third server that has been designated as a global authorization server for globally authorizing sessions for said particular entity; (D) in response to receiving a request to establish a session between the client and the first server for said particular entity, performing the steps of, (E) determining, at the second server based on said distributed resource allocation data whether the session for said particular entity may be established between the client and said first server; (F) if said second server determines that said session cannot be authorized based on said distributed resource allocation data, said second server communicating with said third server to determine whether said third server may authorize said session for said particular entity to be established between said client and said first server; and (G) informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the second server determines that the session may be established for said particular entity.
 2. The method recited in claim 1, wherein step (B) includes the steps of storing, at the second server, a local session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized for said particular entity.
 3. The method recited in claim 2, wherein step (B) comprises the steps of storing, at the second server, a local session counter that identifies a current number of sessions that are established with the first server for said particular entity.
 4. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the first server is a network access server, and wherein step (A) comprises the steps of storing, at the network access server, a reference to a local distributed session counter that stores a local session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized for said particular entity, and a local session counter that identifies a current number of sessions that are currently established by the first server for said particular entity.
 5. The method recited in claim 1, further including the steps of associating with said third server as global session authorization information, a global session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be authorized for said particular entity, and a global session counter that identifies a total number of sessions that are currently established by all servers for said particular entity.
 6. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the second server and the third server are the same server.
 7. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the first server and the second server are the same server.
 8. An authorizing apparatus for use with a client that connects to a first server in a network, comprising: said first server storing data that identifies a second server as a distributed authorization server for authorizing session requests for said first server; the second server storing, distributed resource allocation data that indicates whether said second server may locally authorize a session to be established for a particular entity between the client and the first server; and data that identifies a third server that has been designated as a global authorization server for globally authorizing sessions for said particular entity; means for receiving a request to establish a session between the client and the first server for said particular entity; means for determining, at the second server based on said distributed resource allocation data whether the session for said particular entity may be established between the client and said first server; means for, if said second server determines that said session cannot be authorized based on said distributed resource allocation data, said second server communicating with said third server to determine whether said third server may authorize said session for said particular entity to be established between said client and said first server; and means for informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the second server determines that the session may be established for said particular entity.
 9. The apparatus recited in claim 8, further comprising means for storing a local session threshold value at the second server that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized for said particular entity.
 10. The apparatus recited in claim 9, further comprising means for storing a local session counter at the second server, wherein the local session counter identifies a current number of sessions that are established with the first server for said particular entity.
 11. The apparatus recited in claim 8, wherein the first server is a network access server, and further comprising means for, storing at the network access server, a reference to a local distributed session counter that stores a local session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized for said particular entity, and a local session counter that identifies a current number of sessions that are currently established by the first server for said particular entity.
 12. The apparatus recited in claim 8, further comprising means for associating with said third server as global session authorization information, a global session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be authorized for said particular entity, and a global session counter that identifies a total number of sessions that are currently established by all servers for said particular entity.
 13. The apparatus recited in claim 8, wherein the second server and the third server are the same server.
 14. The apparatus recited in claim 8, wherein the first server and the second server are the same server.
 15. A computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions for authorizing a session between a client and a first server, wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions by one or more processors causes the one or more processors to perform the steps of: (A) storing, in the first server, data that identifies a second server as a distributed authorization server for authorizing session requests for the first server; (B) storing, in the second server, distributed resource allocation data that indicates whether said second server may locally authorize a session to be established for a particular entity between the client and the first server; (C) storing, at the second server, data that identifies a third server that has been designated as a global authorization server for globally authorizing sessions for said particular entity; (D) in response to receiving a request to establish a session between the client and the first server for said particular entity, performing the steps of, (E) determining, at the second server based on said distributed resource allocation data whether the session for said particular entity may be established between the client and said first server; (F) if said second server determines that said session cannot be authorized based on said distributed resource allocation data, said second server communicating with said third server to determine whether said third server may authorize said session for said particular entity to be established between said client and said first server; and (G) informing the first server that the session is authorized only when the second server determines that the session may be established for said particular entity.
 16. The computer-readable medium recited in claim 15, wherein step (B) includes the steps of storing, at the second server, a local session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized for said particular entity.
 17. The computer-readable medium recited in claim 16, wherein step (B) comprises the steps of storing, at the second server, a local session counter that identifies a current number of sessions that are established with the first server for said particular entity.
 18. The computer-readable medium recited in claim 15, wherein the first server is a network access server, and wherein step (A) comprises the steps of storing, at the network access server, a reference to a local distributed session counter that stores a local session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be locally authorized for said particular entity, and a local session counter that identifies a current number of sessions that are currently established by the first server for said particular entity.
 19. The computer-readable medium recited in claim 15, further comprising instructions for performing the steps of associating with said third server as global session authorization information, a global session threshold value that identifies a maximum number of sessions that may be authorized for said particular entity, and a global session counter that identifies a total number of sessions that are currently established by all servers for said particular entity.
 20. A method of authorizing session requests between a client and a first server, the method comprising the computer-implemented steps of: receiving, at a distributed session counter, a first request message, wherein said first request message requests authorization for establishing a session between the client and the first server for a particular entity; in response to receiving said first request message, said distributed session counter determining, based on locally stored resource allocation data, whether said distributed session counter may locally authorize said session to be established between said client and said first server for said particular entity; if said distributed session counter determines that said session may be locally authorized by said distributed session counter, said distributed session counter transmitting a first authorization message to said first server that authorizes the establishment of said session between said client and said first server for said particular entity; if said distributed session counter determines that said session may not be locally authorized by said distributed session counter, said distributed session counter transmitting a second request message to a global session counter that requests authorization to authorize the establishment of said session for said particular entity, wherein said global session counter is associated with global resource allocation data that identifies the total number of sessions that are currently established for said particular entity; in response to receiving said second request message, said global session counter determining, based on said global resource allocation data, whether said global session counter should authorize said session to be established between said client and said first server for said particular entity; if said global session counter determines that said session should be authorized, said global session counter transmitting a second authorization message to said distributed session counter, wherein said second authorization message authorizes said distributed session counter to authorize the establishment of said session between said client and said first server for said particular entity; and if said global session counter determines that said session should not be authorized, said global session counter transmitting a non-authorization message to said distributed session counter, wherein said non-authorization message indicates that said distributed session counter is not authorized to authorize the establishment of said session between said client and said first server for said particular entity. 